>As always, great stuff from Frances Chan – spend three minutes on this:
>Here is great stuff from Mark Batterson:
“Everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial.”
Your future is found in I Corinthians 10:23. It reveals two options: permissible or beneficial. And your destiny will be determined by which option you choose.
Who we become is determined by whether we settle for what is permissible or strive for what is beneficial. It’s so tempting to live down to what is required. It’s so tempting to live in our comfort zone. It’s so tempting to take the path of least resistance, but the path of least resistance never takes you where you really want to go!
What am I getting at? Well, are you setting for what is permissible? Or are you striving for what is beneficial? Are you giving God leftovers? Or are you seeking first the kingdom of God? Where are you compromising? Where have you become comfortable with what is permissible?
Don’t let short-term comfort short-circuit God’s long-terms plans for your life. Spiritual short-cuts always turn into detours! Take the hard way. Take the high road. Strive for what is beneficial.
>“God calls us to duty, and the only right answer is obedience. If it can be glad and willing and loving obedience, happy are we; but, in any case, whether we ourselves get enjoyment and blessing from the task or not, the call must be obeyed. The will of God must be done for the sake of God, not for the sake of ourselves. Undertake the duty, and step by step God will provide the disposition. We can at least obey. Ideal obedience includes the whole will and the whole heart. We cannot begin with that. But we can begin with what we have. God calls. It is better to obey blunderingly than not to obey at all”.
>Last night, at teen camp, I showed a clip of the young Celtic Thunder guy singing “Puppy Love.”
I reminded the students that puppy love is simply being in love with the idea of love; not a person. I then suggested that there is a sort of “Jesus” puppy love; where one is in love with the idea of Jesus, the benefits of Jesus, the music of Jesus, but not in love with Jesus.
We talked about “you are My friends if you do whatever I command,” and, of course, John 14.21.
Then this afternoon I found this quote from John R. W. Stott:
John Stott in an appendix with the title, “Reflections of an Octogenarian, 27 April 2001”:
. . . Let me share with you a conviction about obedience. John 14:21 is one of my favorite verses. Here are the words of Jesus: “Whoever has my commandments and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him.”
The verse ends with a particularly precious promise: “I will show myself to him (or her)”, or “I will manifest myself to him.” Is this just what we are longing for, namely a clearer vision of Christ? . . .
But this promise of Jesus is conditional. He reveals himself only to his lovers. And who are his lovers? Not those who make loud protestations of love, and then go out like Peter to deny him. Not those who sing rather sentimental songs “Jesus, I love you.” (It is all right to sing them too, but they do not prove anything.) No, those who truly love the Lord Jesus are those who obey his commandments.
To sum up, the test of love is obedience, and the reward of love is a self-manifestation of Christ.
– John Stott , The Living Church: Convictions of a Lifelong Pastor
I kinda wish I’d found the quote before I preached!
>Okay, for most it is summer and vacation etc…and no one wants to think about ‘indicatives’ and ‘imperatives,’ but this is worth the time to carefully consider:
“In every other religion the indicative flows from the imperative. Which means, ‘because I do, therefore I am… because I do this, therefore I’m a child of God.’ But only in Christianity does the imperative flow from the indicative. ‘Because I am in Christ all these things, therefore I obey.’ Exactly the opposite.”
– Tim Keller, Led by the Spirit (message given at Redeemer Presbyterian Church)